Government to introduce blended learning in select city schools from next week

People/ File:Asia news network

 According to Asia news network, lawmakers in Vermont’s House of Representatives gave initial approval Thursday night to a new education reform proposal, though it is far less sweeping than the plan supported by the governor. The vote passed 79 to 62.

Rising school costs had already triggered strong backlash from taxpayers two years ago, shifting political power at the Statehouse. After multiple failed attempts to fix education funding, legislators approved Act 73 last year—an ambitious effort to merge school districts and reduce expenses. Now, the future of that plan is uncertain.

Democratic leaders say the new proposal, House Bill 955, builds on Act 73 but takes a more moderate approach. According to House Speaker Jill Krowinski, the goal is to listen to communities, prioritize students, and still protect taxpayers.

The bill promotes voluntary mergers between school districts and encourages cost savings through shared regional services. It also introduces a new funding formula for schools and proposes a tax on second homes.

Top Democrats say that after months of discussion, it became clear that residents do not support mandatory district mergers. Representative Peter Conlon, chair of the House Education Committee, warned that forcing mergers would likely fail and create frustration and distrust. He added that several issues-such as transportation, special education, and adapting to the new funding system-will likely be addressed after the next election. He emphasized that long-term reforms depend on future lawmakers continuing the effort.

Earlier, legislative leaders had agreed with Republican Governor Phil Scott that forced consolidation was necessary. However, Scott still believes it is the only effective way to cut costs, particularly by reducing the number of school employees, which he says drive most of the spending. As it stands, the bill is expected to face a veto.

Scott criticized lawmakers for delaying meaningful action, saying they have wasted a decade maintaining the current system. He argued that while people want tax relief, achieving that requires building a more efficient system.

The bill will need one more vote in the House on Friday before moving to the Senate, which will develop its own version during the final weeks of the legislative session.